Government by the people and for the people

The story about my spiritual beliefs, the North Carolina Constitution and one man’s threat to unseat me has gone viral, both in print and on the Web. I’m fielding e-mails from dozens of people around the country—so far all supportive—and the writers include Christians as well as atheists and Quakers and Muslims and pagans and more.

I’ve read some of the thousands of comments posted on blogs and the vast majority of folks support the separation of church and state that has figured so prominently in the history of this country. It is reassuring to me that there is such a broad understanding that freedom OF religion necessarily includes freedom FROM religion, else such a guarantee has no real meaning. Our country was founded by people who had suffered first-hand the demagoguery of state-religion and religious persecution, and we see today the dangers inherent in such systems where they persist.

While many ideologues continue to advance the idea that our Founders’ language concerning rights “endowed by our creator” is the core tenet of this country, and that finding favor with God is the root of our success, I’m more inclined to think that it is the legacy of adherence to science that is the most important contribution of Jefferson, Franklin, Washington and their peers.

Science. not God, is the real source of America’s power—science unencumbered by dogma and empowered by vast resource wealth. Other societies have surely included as high a percentage of the religious faithful as ours, but the difference here was the institutionalized effort to liberate experimental results from the grip of received wisdom. Whether or not we remain the freest society on earth today can be debated, but we were unarguably the first to fully embrace the enlightenment and to institutionalize equality before the law (however imperfectly it has been enforced).

Among my many new correspondents, I’ve found atheist critics who suggest that my stated positions are too temperate and that I’m being less than forthright by labeling myself as “post-theist” rather than atheist. For example one blogger said, “he offers some language that avoids full ownership of the position at times.”

By way of explanation I offer this: It seems to me that theism emerged in human thinking over thousands of years during which we had scant explanation for many of the phenomena in our world. We didn’t understand our origins, whether in utero or in the ancient past. We didn’t understand disease or the vagaries of weather that brought so much suffering to our lives. We didn’t know what the lights in the night sky were or what forces controlled them. And so we handed all the unknowns over to a deity or deities and looked for their favor since they seemed to run the show.

Atheism, a rejection of theism, was an obvious outgrowth of the Enlightenment as science began to provide explanations for ancient mysteries. As a word it perfectly expresses what it means—not theist. Unfortunately, atheism has been draped with a strong sense of the negative, principally by its opponents, in the same way that the word “liberal” was poisoned by conservative pundits over the past few decades. I’m not averse to being called what I am, but I don’t accept the baggage that others attach to their use of that word.

I view my own position has having been shaped in an era during which virtually all of the day-to-day phenomena we experience are explainable by science. While it’s true that there remain unknowns and even unknown unknowns, those blank spaces have been pushed to the margins. Even the well known evangelist Billy Graham, subject of my 2007 biography, has pushed his interpretation of the creation story back 5 billion years. Theism has become marginal. We are living in a post-theist era.

When it is combined with government, theism remains dangerous. The current wars in the mid-east were first cast as a “crusade” by George Bush and continue to have a strong religious component, with the evangelical-led Blackwater a poster-child for all that can go wrong. To the extent that we delude ourselves into believing that “God is on our side,” we leave ourselves open to despotism. We ignore what the Bush administration disparaged as “the reality-based community” at our peril.

Blind belief in the righteousness of our current wars is bankrupting this country while our economy has gone into a tailspin. And while our leaders often cloak their actions with prayer and religious posturing, it is the oil companies and defense contractors who reap profits while our young women and men sacrifice their lives.

And, in regard to death, it is my conclusion that those of us who believe that this is our one and only life are much more likely to value and protect the lives of our brave soldiers and our citizens than those who believe that they will live again in heaven.

Advertisements

16 Responses

  1. You rock! My husband and I are in your camp, but we don’t belong to any church, just getting by in the world. I like what you had to say in this morning’s paper about drawing from inspirational texts when your turn comes up to lead a prayer at the City Council meeting in January. I too don’t get my knickers in a knot over religion until somebody tries enforcing it on me.

  2. Thank you so much for such a tempered, educational, and rational essay. I am hopeful that the hometown conflict over your seat is loud enough to garner national attention. The debate about separation between church and state is both relevant and necessary but sorely missing in much of our political discussion. How sad that atheists (post-theists) are reviled while the most frightening crimes against humanity have been committed by religious peoples assured of their righteousness.

  3. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Luke, Moon Howler. Moon Howler said: Read! RT @Unstrung Government by the people and for the people http://bit.ly/6AHzoM "unconstitutional" atheist public official in NC […]

  4. Thanks you so much for your principled stand and your words in defense of freedom of conscience. You have a lot of support among freethinkers AND religious people who understand the Separation between church and state.

  5. Good Luck to you! I am writing a post about this tonight. Saw it on Rachel Maddow. Long live Article VI, Clause 3 and our 1st Amendment!! http://www.akopsa.wordpress.com

  6. Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by Unstrung: Government by the people and for the people http://bit.ly/6AHzoM (from the “unconstitutional” atheist public official in Asheville, NC)…

  7. Nice work Cecil!

    Thank you very much for expanding on your views in in such an articulate and intelligent manner. I agree with you that science is indeed America’s main source of power, and that rationality, not superstition, should guide our lives and our government.

    Keep up the good work!!

  8. Very well written position Mr. Bothwell. I agree with your statements, and I hope this ridiculous lawsuit is just a speedbump on your way to bigger, and greater things. Good luck!

  9. Thank you so much for your wonderful representation. I extend my support and gratitude- please keep it up!

  10. Hold fast to your convictions, and use whatever language you like. This is a fine essay, and it illuminates your position very well. Do not listen to the atheist critics that say that you are not hard line enough. The godless movement needs people who speak to all aspects of the struggle with superstition. The screaming hard line extremists serve to make the religious uncomfortable, but they raise awareness with their vitriol. The apologists show that everyone can get along no matter how crazy their “beliefs”. The middle road is populated by reasonable thoughtful people like yourself, and it is from within this group that the real progress will be made.

    You are blazing the trail for other godless people to follow, and I for one have the utmost respect for that.

  11. I read about you in the LA times. I just wanted to say, stay strong. It is about time that the population of America realizes atheists, or post-thiests, can do excellent jobs jobs (if not better than those with hands tied by a church) in public office and lead moral lives.
    Don’t stop fighting. Let them take you to court–the US Constitution has your back and it trumps the state constitution. Clear cut case.
    You are helping to pave the long road towards a non-religious president. Thanks!

  12. Saw on LA times.

    My only hopes to you is that things will change and constituents to see the light and push things towards the right direction.

    Good luck!

  13. Thanks for standing strong. Ignore the crazies and keep up the good work. Blessings!

  14. We need people like you in Texas. When will people wake up?

  15. I heard about your story in a popular election methods discussion list, and I just wanted to send my support. Having long ago left my native Kansas for San Francisco, I have become quite naive about the hostility toward atheism that still exists all across the country (and much of the world for that matter). This is a reminder that non-theists need to stay strong in the face of dogma and Constitutional disregard. Oh the irony that people are invoking the N.C. constitution against you, yet acting oblivious to the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

  16. Great piece! Than you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: